monsterfish did a good approach of what happened yesterday. I have to thank to this guy for his vision (and I think this is the first time I reblog at Science is Beauty):
Scienceisbeauty has been getting a lot of flack from climate change trolls who are prepared to vilify and attack anyone who even slightly disagrees with them. Science has to be open to debate, differences of opinion. The moment someone is attacked for not adhering to scientific dogma, it smacks of religion. Scientific thought is based upon hypotheses that are then backed up by scientific experiments; they can be disproved at anytime. As for accusing Scienisbeauty of being a creationist simply for not having the same opinion as you, that is beyond hypocritical. Religious people often attack others who do not agree with them, because they can’t think beyond their own worldview. Science is (or, sadly, ought to be) above that.
The four legged of the Anthropogenic Global Warming table.
Cartoon by Josh
Source: the new and improved 4 legged AGW table at Watts Up With That?
